Standing - Courtroom Rights
Standing is a very important if arcane legal concept used by HAF, the
Trust bank and the Courts to thwart attempts to put the HAF and Wells
Fargo Bank back on track after their post 1993 shenanigans. Vera's will
clearly gave her Perrott 'watchdog' nieces and nephews standing to provided
Vera's intended 'checks and balances' on a banking and HAF bureaucracy
Vera mistrusted, and which the Perrotts allege have gone amok post 1993,
destroying the public's Lynn Vietor Nature Preserve funded by invaded
Trust principal, etc.
Prior to the 1999 through current Vera vs. HAF and Wells Fargo Bank
legal actions, the post 1992 (Pennekamp era), HAF and Wells Fargo Bank
unilaterally 'decided' (no court proceedings) to deny standing to Vera's
watchdogs, i.e. the Perrott's were never given proper legal notice of
clandestine court proceedings so Vera's side and interests could be
represented in court wherein HAF and Wells Fargo Bank sought to do acts
breaching Vera's will and trust, resulting in destroying the public's
Nature Preserve with Vera's invaded Trust principal.
Lack of legal notice is contrary to a paramount principle of California
and USA 'rule of law' providing 'equal protection and due process' under
the American justice system.
Had the California Supreme Court (Vera's case against HAF and Bank
was appealled but denied review) affirmed the Watchdog's standing, all
of the 1994 through 1999 'questionable' court orders breaching Vera's
will without Vera's Watchdogs knowledge (not being given notice of legal
proceedings) would have been void because Vera's interests did not have
representation in court, or equal protection and due process of the
law. The Perrotts have 90 days from the mid February 'Denial to Review'
by California. They plan to appeal to the US Supreme Court.
In current legal wrangling, HAF and Wells Fargo Bank, the same entities
that did not give legal notice and did unilateral wrongful acts, are
now seeking to hide behind their misdeeds by claiming Vera's watchdog
Perrott's have no standing, and can not question those acts in any court
of law, a procedural 'whitewash' of alleged fiduciary irresponsibility
From Vera's point of view this exemplifies the post 1992 HAF and Wells
Fargo Bank regime, including dereliction of fiduciary responsibility
and violation of trustee duties by way of destruction of the public's
Lynn Vietor Nature Preserve with invaded trust principal. Vera unknowningly
created a Frankenstein monster, which in Post-1992 HAF is destroying
what Vera created.